In their quest for “play-in”, the Spurs want to sweep the Blazers

In their quest for “play-in”, the Spurs want to sweep the Blazers

+31 at the start of December, +37 at the end of March and +19 on April 1: the Spurs are not the kind of pranksters with the Blazers this season. Next night, the two teams meet for the fourth time this season, the second time in a row in San Antonio. This will be an opportunity for the Texans to “sweep” their opponents. And, more importantly, to take an additional step towards the “play-in”.

Portland, which is however only five games behind them, no longer plays anything except the development of its young people.

Portland was understaffed, that’s for sure, but you take any win, no matter how you get it. We played well, it was a good mental test. Our players were very focused in these circumstances and did a good job. We have another Sunday (today), we have to do the same “, Displayed Gregg Popovich after this last quiet victory (130-111).

This success, coupled with the Lakers’ fifth straight loss, allowed his team (32v-45d) to secure 10th place, synonymous with “play-in”, with a victory ahead of the Lakers (31v -46d). A new success against these weak Blazers, while the Lakers receive the Nuggets (before continuing with the Suns and the Warriors), could seal this race for indirect qualification for the playoffs.

All the games right now are super important so we gotta be in itshowed Zach Collins (15 points, 9 rebounds and 5 assists in this last game). We had a good state of mind at the start and we had to make sure we got this victory. Even when you’re ahead, it’s hard to keep the advantage in this league, and we kept it. »

The Spurs now have a narrow lead over the Californians. Pledge to them to keep it on the remaining five games and thus afford a chance to find the playoffs.

Shots Bounces
Players GM Minimum Shots 3 points LF Off Def Early pd bp Int CT party Points
Dejounte Murray 67 34.8 46.3 33.0 78.8 1.2 7.2 8.4 9.3 2.7 2.0 0.3 2.0 21.2
Keldon Johnson 71 31.7 46.6 40.2 75.8 1.1 5.0 6.1 2.0 1.3 0.7 0.2 1.9 16.7
Derrick White 49 30.3 42.6 31.4 86.9 0.5 3.0 3.5 5.6 1.8 1.0 0.9 2.4 14.4
Jakob Poeltl 65 29.0 61.8 100.0 49.4 3.9 5.3 9.2 2.8 1.6 0.7 1.8 3.1 13.4
Devin Vasell 67 27.0 42.8 35.4 82.8 0.6 3.6 4.3 1.9 0.8 1.0 0.6 2.1 12.1
lonnie walker 67 23.0 40.8 31.3 77.1 0.3 2.3 2.5 2.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 1.4 12.1
Doug Mcdermott 51 24.0 46.2 42.2 78.4 0.4 1.9 2.3 1.3 0.8 0.3 0.1 1.5 11.3
Josh Richardson 16 24.2 42.6 44.6 96.2 0.9 2.0 2.9 2.4 1.3 1.1 0.4 1.6 10.9
Bryn Forbes 40 16.9 43.2 41.7 89.8 0.1 1.5 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.1 1.1 9.1
Romeo Langford 1 16.1 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0
Zach Collins 23 17.1 46.7 32.4 80.0 1.7 3.4 5.1 2.1 1.5 0.4 0.8 2.4 6.9
Thaddeus Young 26 14.3 57.8 0.0 45.5 1.5 2.0 3.6 2.3 1.2 0.9 0.3 1.5 6.1
Joshua Primo 45 18.5 37.3 29.8 76.6 0.7 1.6 2.3 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.5 1.5 5.5
Tre Jones 64 15.6 48.8 12.8 79.2 0.4 1.7 2.1 3.0 0.6 0.6 0.1 1.0 5.3
Keita Bates-diop 54 15.9 50.2 33.3 73.2 1.0 2.9 3.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.0 5.3
Jock Landale 51 10.8 51.0 33.7 83.8 1.1 1.3 2.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.3 1.0 5.0
Drew Eubanks 49 12.1 52.8 12.5 74.7 1.3 2.7 4.0 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.6 1.2 4.7
Devontae Cacok 11 8.4 69.2 0.0 57.1 0.6 2.6 3.3 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.6 1.1 3.6
Tomas Satoransky 1 9.2 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
Joe Wieskamp 25 6.4 38.0 34.2 55.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.2
Tyler Johnson 3 17.7 20.0 33.3 0.0 0.7 1.3 2.0 1.7 0.3 0.7 0.7 1.0 2.0
Juancho Hernangomez 5 10.1 33.3 0.0 75.0 0.8 2.2 3.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4
Jaylen Morris 3 5.3 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7
Anthony Lamb 2 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.